Search found 24 matches
- Sat Mar 07, 2009 7:34 pm
- Forum: All General Questions about NSF
- Topic: Bushfires in Victoria: Natural sequence hydrology approach
- Replies: 40
- Views: 43884
Gottleibsen's pyromaniac comments
Novaris wrote: "Regarding the fire problem how do we go about dealing with articles like the following? http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/bushfires-$pd20090210-P4U79?OpenDocument" All we can do is contradict them by posting replies to them but also by publishing contrary articles, d...
- Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:46 pm
- Forum: All General Questions about NSF
- Topic: Bushfires in Victoria: Natural sequence hydrology approach
- Replies: 40
- Views: 43884
To Brett re rain-dancing
Hi Brett,
Thanks for the thoughts.
I like dancing but tend to feel that the trees are the ones that make the rain.
Otherwise we agree, of course.
Sheila N
Thanks for the thoughts.
I like dancing but tend to feel that the trees are the ones that make the rain.
Otherwise we agree, of course.
Sheila N
- Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:43 pm
- Forum: All General Questions about NSF
- Topic: Bushfires in Victoria: Natural sequence hydrology approach
- Replies: 40
- Views: 43884
Thank you Duane. I have to agree that I share your fears about huge gaps between rains, until the state simply burns to a crisp - and I share your hope. I republished your article here https://candobetter.org/node/1118 I must read Peter's new book - I didn't realise there was one. (Not a great tv wa...
- Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:15 pm
- Forum: All General Questions about NSF
- Topic: Trees
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10542
- Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:58 am
- Forum: All General Questions about NSF
- Topic: Trees
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10542
The Eucalyptus monocultures are a product of fire, as far as I can see, and, if we want to diminish bushfires, we need to assist the forests to change their composition and climate. That means an adaptation away from eucalyptus. Apparently the eucalyptus forests are less flammable after 30 years and...
- Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:30 am
- Forum: Letters to Government about NSF
- Topic: UPDATE from Victoria
- Replies: 49
- Views: 67009
Request permission to republish
Duane, This is exactly what I think. So good to read. Could I republish it at http://candobetter.org under "Victorian fires" section? Let me know what signature and any other details you would like posted with it, if you agree to republish. Sheila Newman Ed and Population and Environment Sociologist...
- Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:34 am
- Forum: All General Questions about NSF
- Topic: Trees
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10542
Fire-resistant forest and managed forest: Bushfires in Vic
My first post to NSF forum was a couple of days ago, to the 'General Questions'. I have had no public response so far, but the subject is really important in the light of calls to clear forest in Victoria after the bushfires. I feel that this can only make things far, far worse on every level. I the...
- Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:37 pm
- Forum: All General Questions about NSF
- Topic: 'Controlling' Weeds
- Replies: 54
- Views: 91403
Does nothing eat the melons?
What happens to the melons? Does nothing eat them?
Sheila N
Sheila N
- Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:33 am
- Forum: All General Questions about NSF
- Topic: Bushfires in Victoria: Natural sequence hydrology approach
- Replies: 40
- Views: 43884
Bushfires in Victoria: Natural sequence hydrology approach
I am a great admirer of Peter Andrew’s methods, theory and practice as described in his book. Here is my review at http://candobetter.org/node/975 I have mentioned Peter Andrews in the article I discuss below (http://candobetter.org/node/1062) and could well have written the article around his book ...